Category Archives: politics

Hey U.S., Who Are Our Neighbors?

The party in political power at the moment has asserted a reinterpretation of Jesus’ and the Bible’s teachings about our neighbor. Who the neighbor is, and what our responsibility to them is in relation to our responsibility to ourselves and our closest circles of family and community. We see it being played out in executive action and legislative inaction. On January 29, 2025, Vice President JD Vance in a Fox News interview said, “There is a Christian concept that you love your family and then you love your neighbor, and then you love your community, and then you love your fellow citizens, and then after that, prioritize the rest of the world. A lot of the far left has completely inverted that.”

No, there isn’t s biblically based Christian concept like that, Mr. Vance. There are many issues that can be seen differently but this is not one of them. Neither Jesus nor the Bible in general have any ambiguity on this issue. In fact, biblically speaking, asking whether there is an order to our responsibility is the wrong question to ask. The question isn’t “who first?” but “who needs us?” We are directed to love others, and yes that can be hard and require sacrifice on our part, but it is intrinsic to the life and faith of Jesus and the message of the Bible. Let me walk us through a few places in the Bible where this is made clear.

Jesus’ parable known as The Good Samaritan told in Luke’s Gospel (Luke 9.25-37) speaks directly to this. It starts with an expert on the law, someone who teaches and explains the Torah in the synagogue, coming to Jesus to test him. He asks what he must do to inherit eternal life. The word ‘test’ suggests that he was there to try to trip up Jesus. And Jesus characteristically turns the question back to the man. “What does the law say? How do you read it?” To which the man answers “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind.” This comes right from the Torah he is the expert on. That love mentioned doesn’t mean to just adore God, but to align with God’s ways, be in right relationship with God, or to use biblical language, be righteous in God’s eyes. Then he adds another bit of the Torah as if it were part of the former, “and [love] your neighbor as yourself.” Loving oneself is affirmed but not as an end to itself, it is a model for loving the neighbor.

Jesus tells him he got it right, “You have given the right answer; do this, and you will live.”

That leaves some wiggle room though. After all, those strangers far away, or new to my community aren’t really neighbors, right?! And that is exactly the question the man returns to Jesus, “Who is my neighbor?” The story tells us he asks this to justify or vindicate himself. Perhaps that means to get himself off the hook for the implications of what he just said the Torah, the Bible, says. Regardless of his motives Jesus’ answer has the same message, and he answers with a story, a parable.

The story is likely familiar. A man was on the road out of Jerusalem and was mugged. Stripped, robbed, beaten and left in the ditch. Two people pass by – both Jews. A priest and a Levite. People of authority in the religious and civic life of the time. They pass by ignoring the man. Then the parable tells us a third came by, a Samaritan. Samaritans aren’t Jews and, to use modern terms, are highly polarized from the Jews. Of the three, this is the one we would least expect to help, but he does. The Samaritan tends to him, inconveniences himself, pays for his care and follows up with him.

At the end of the parable Jesus asks, “Which of the three was a neighbor to the man who was robbed?” The man of the law not quite able to say the name “Samaritan” says, “The one who showed him mercy.” To which Jesus says simply, “Go and do likewise.” [It is worth noting that Jesus doesn’t say, “Wait and do likewise, if someone with need shows up.” Jesus says “Go!” He calls us to action. He sends us out to seek and serve the brother or sister in need.]

Jesus defines neighbor as the person, known or unknown by us, near or far. Simply put, everyone. And he defines the nature of our relationship with our neighbor: Care for them. Not if it is convenient, not if we have everything of our own fully taken care of. No, “Love your neighbor just like you would love yourself.” A command that is repeated in Matthew and Mark’s gospels, and in Romans, Galatians, and James. Love the outsider, love the needy, whoever they are, just like you would love yourself. That is a reflection of loving God with your heart, soul, strength, and mind.

This teaching of Jesus isn’t meant to take away from self-care, nor be an excuse for neglecting our own family or community. Rather it is there to remind us of the larger family we are inextricably part of. God’s family.  

Let’s look at another familiar story from Jesus. As he is teaching he talks figuratively about The King, God, who speaks to those who have either done or not done what he willed them to do (Matthew 25.31-46). They were asked to ‘feed the hungry, give a drink to the thirsty, welcome the stranger, clothe the naked, care for the sick, visit the imprisoned.’ He ends by telling his listeners and us, “Just as you did it to one of the least of these brothers (and sisters) of mine, you did it to me.” The ‘least’ of my people; the most trivial, insignificant of them. No conditions. In prison rightly or wrongly. Familiar or stranger. Deserving or undeserving. They all count, they are all neighbors, God’s people, our family. There is no order among them giving preference to those nearest you genetically or geographically. After all, according to Jesus’ story it is The King, God, whom we are loving when we do this.

We can reach into the Old Testament and find this theme played out repeatedly as well. God doesn’t prioritize the powerful or the familiar over others. More often the Bible gives a seat at the table to one whom others wouldn’t expect, understand, or like; Joseph, Moses, David to name a notable few. After all, Israel itself was made up of the least among the people of their day, and Good loves, provides, and executes justice for the outsider as this passage from Deuteronomy (10.17-19) records.

For the LORD your God is God of gods and Lord of lords, the great God, mighty and awesome, who is not partial and takes no bribe, who executes justice for the orphan and the widow, and who loves the strangers, providing them food and clothing. You shall also love the stranger, for you were strangers in the land of Egypt.

We can cite example after example of this basic recognition and value of the stranger, like in Paul’s letter 1 Corinthians 10.24  “Do not seek your own advantage, but that of the other, the neighbor” but the best witness is God and Jesus themselves. “For God so loved the world (read everyone and everything), that God gave his only son…” (John 3.16) No prioritization or protection for those close to oneself in God’s love there! God so loved seemingly others that he gave up what was closest. Wow! And then there is Jesus. He was a model of self-sacrifice for humanity. He gave a gift to all people – that includes you, it includes me – of what was closest and most precious, his life.

As individuals, and as a nation, do we care for our own first, and then those close to us, and if there is enough, then others too? Is it the responsibility of those closer to them to care for them, not ours?

Or do we seek to help the marginalized, the poor, the disadvantaged? Do we welcome the stranger? The latter is what Jesus did, and his word to us, “Go and do likewise.”

What if… a Muslim spoke at Jacob’s Well the week bin Laden was killed?

May 2011 worship series - Jacob's Well | Minneapolis

This is a little too amazing to believe, but a Muslim is scheduled to speak at Jacob’s Well the week after bin Laden died and this opportunity has great potential for healing.

Jacob’s Well began a new worship series on May 1 that we call “What if…?” We think “What if…?” is the way God looks at the world and our lives. We have a God of possibilities and creativity, and likewise God has made us to be “What if…?” people. During these five weeks we are trying out some big what if’s, including, “What if religion united us instead of divided us?” And to do it we brought in a local Muslim leader, Abdisalam Adam, who spoke to the gathering at our Longfellow location last Sunday (May 1) and will be doing the same at our Field location this Sunday (May 8).

The purpose is to get a deeper understanding of another faith tradition and let that help us respect and learn from each other. Osama bin Laden’s death, and all the controversy surrounding that (see my last two blog postings, “Ought I rejoice…” & “Moral High Ground: Doing the right thing…), has opened a window for learning. What is Islam? Who are the people who follow it? Did bin Laden represent them? Even though Muslims no longer live half way around the world, but right in our own backyards, we see them as strangers rather than neighbors. What if we actually saw them as neighbors?

Here’s  a chance to make a little progress in that direction. Join us at Jacob’s Well Field this Sunday, 10:30, or watch for the audio or video of the service later through our website, www.jacobs-well.net.

[By the way, if you come to our Longfellow location you will hear Carla Barnhill, ABC-News runner up for their national advice guru, an amazing South Minneapolis citizen and thinker, co-present on “What if… love really did win?”]

Olympic Protests or National Accountability?

Olympic Torch Protest in Paris

The protests over the Olympics have really gotten my attention.  My very first reaction was why would people mess with this wonderful tradition of the Olympics and the carrying of the torch.  I mean, what could be better than that?  But that isn’t the point, is it…  People aren’t protesting the Olympics, but they feel compelled to speak against the host country.  They are saying ‘something is rotten in Denmark’ (or China, in this case) and we can’t just say, “Rah Rah Olympics” when the host is oppressing a nation (Tibet, again, in this case).

Now I’ve no intention to comment on human rights abuses in the People’s Republic of China.  But I find the idea that the world (i.e. citizens of other countries a long, long way away from them, and with little or no say in that country) feel it is within their rights, responsibilities, even duty to hold China accountable.  I realize expatriated Tibetans, who are very involved with the situation are doing a lot of the protesting, but their support comes from their new countries of residence.

One of the unhelpful responses is for us westerners to point our fingers at China and say, “Ha, teaches you right.  You are doing bad things and the world is unhappy with you.”  We are tempted to do that because China has us all scared silly with their growing muscle in the economic, research, population, manufacturing, etc worlds.  You name it, after being in the lead so long we don’t know what to do with the fact that we see a much bigger vehicle approaching quickly in our rearview mirror.

The fact is that the world is shrinking.  While the world is getting more and more sophisticated and urban anonymity is more and more available to us, we are also getting closer and closer to each other.  We have a million ways, and a million watchdogs helping us look over each others’ shoulders.  And so our noses are in each others’ business.  Rightly or wrongly… doesn’t matter.  We are doing it.

Here is the other fact, lest we be smug Americans (this could also be written for Europeans, Australians, Japanese, whoever… but I’ll let them speak for themselves).  If the Olympics were to be held in the U.S. the torch bearing would be going no more smoothly.  Can you think of any nation whose citizens wouldn’t be stopping the torch and saying, “Out of Iraq!”  or “You’re not our policeman!” or “Clean up your industry before you tell others to do it!” or “Free the detainees in Guantanamo!” or “Restore Civil Rights in your country!”

Again, I’m not endorsing those critiques (although I do have my opinions; you have to buy me a beer, not just read my blog to get those), but I am saying that the same accountability the ‘world’ is leveling at China would also be leveled against us.  And we’d have to face it.  Here’s what we can have control over… actually two things:

1. Is it a good thing?  Is this just entitled judgmentalism on a global scale?  Or is it a global conscience learning how to flex its muscle? I’d venture a guess that it is a little bit of both and that such attempts are probably the only way the global community will learn to be mature with its new found power.  Besides, its going to happen, might as well get the adolescent acne stage going so it can be over with.

2. Are we going to seek to be ‘above scrutiny’ or not?  Is there, at least some, truth in the charges coming from all quarters that we can learn from? Again, I’ll venture a guess and say, “yes.”

Are there some early sounds of the kingdom of God in these groans of childbirth?  Hmmm…

Does Religion belong in Politics?

I blogged about this general concept before (read here).  Mark Tranvik, friend of mine from long ago and a very sharp thinker, had a great piece printed on the featured page (that’s the righthand page for us STrib readers) in the op-ed section of today’s (1.7.2008) Minneapolis StarTribune. Read the article here.

Mark says good things that help clear up this messy intersection. I agree with him that, of course, we have to bring our faith into our politics. Why? Because our faith (Christian, but I bet every faith would agree on this) calls us to love our neighbors and care about creation. That is more than personal piety, it pulls us into the political realm whether we want to or not. But  when we take a position on an issue or pick our candidate it is us picking the position or person, with our best judgment and understanding, it isn’t God. We need to acknowledge that. It is fine to say that we arrived at this because of our spiritual convictions, but we cannot pretend we are speaking for God.

The addition I’d make, or stress a little more, is that churches (local or denominational) do not have the job of rallying their forces for a particular stand on an issue or a particular candidate, as if it were a litmus test for being a ‘real Christian.’ Rather churches can say that issues are important, that elections are important, and can (should) provide opportunities to learn more and to be places that conversations can take place.  That way churches help their people live out their faith; deciding for themselves what is the best way to participate in the political process – employing their best faith, intellect and intention.  Let’s trust God’s Spirit to lead this!  As a church we should promote and appreciate people doing what they believe is right, not conforming to the church’s stand, promoting divisiveness and exclusion.  That hearkens back to my last blog

Thanks Mark!